The Even Yearbook 3 (1998)

#31

volume: 3 (1998)
pages: 251–263
author: László Varga
title: The Intonational Phrase and Secondary Intonational Phrase Formation in Hungarian
abstract: The first part of this article explores the possibility of analysing Hungarian intonation in terms of Intonational Phrases (IPs) consisting of Preparatory Part, Scale and Terminal Part, and shows that such an analysis, though not strictly necessary, has more advantages than the analysis without IPs. Then the second part examines the processes fo Secondary IP Formation, i.e., character insertion and character change, by which an originally syntax-related IP is split into two IPs, for attitudinal reasons. Secondary IP Formation is not a real counter-argument against the “IP” approach to Hungarian intonation.
PDF:   full text
refs: ⟨BibTeX⟩ ⟨RIS⟩ ⟨txt⟩

98va.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0